notes July 14

July 14, 2008 § Leave a comment

Lets’s start with Paul Krugman this morning.

And yes, there is a real political scandal here: there have been repeated warnings that Fannie’s and Freddie’s thin capitalization posed risks to taxpayers, but the companies’ management bought off the political process, systematically hiring influential figures from both parties. While they were ugly, however, Fannie’s and Freddie’s political machinations didn’t play a significant role in causing our current problems.

Still, isn’t it shocking that taxpayers may end up having to rescue these institutions? Not really. We’re going through a major financial crisis — and such crises almost always end with some kind of taxpayer bailout for the banking system.

And let’s be clear: Fannie and Freddie can’t be allowed to fail. With the collapse of subprime lending, they’re now more central than ever to the housing market, and the economy as a whole.

What he does not address is, who wins and who loses? To me the problem is that the whole financial sector is too big a piece of the economy. it is like the house in Roulette, only instead of just 0 and 00 it also has added 000 and 0000, thereby increasing even further its percentage of the take.

and

see Manufactured Landscapes. and more

and

Richard Coyne, Ubiquitous technologies and the design of places for meaningful human encounter

Meetings are now less constrained to offices, shops and fixed points of service, and can take place in a range of environments, including branded places: coffee houses, transportation hubs, customised meeting places, and informal, locally-branded spaces. People are drawn to places that have particular meanings as loci of human encounter. Communications technologies are implicated in this move into the variegated brandscape.
We gather evidence for these assertions about the rise of branded meeting places, examine the suitability of branded spaces for human encounters (eg meetings amongst business associates, between service providers and clients), and develop strategies for improving the technologies that support them. In the process we will critically examine and analyse branded spaces, theories about their formation, and how they operate as loci of human encounter.

Which fits my use of the Cantor’s cafe at Stanford.

and

Is there a connection between the hyper-rationalism of the Renaissance and the absolutism of Calvinism? And then the absolutism of the counter reformation, and then of the enlightenment and of romanticism? And then of Positivism, and, in the exhaustion – the decline of humane culture and the rise of techno-culture?

and

Obama’s op-ed on Iraq will require revisiting, so here is the url

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/14/opinion/14obama.html?em&ex=1216267200&en=693dcfabffcdace0&ei=5087

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading notes July 14 at Reflections on GardenWorld Politics Douglass Carmichael.

meta

%d bloggers like this: