349. Clarity

March 8, 2010 § Leave a comment

I really like these descriptions but it highlights for me why I am so drawn to psychoanalysis and literature. The increased depth and awareness of the cloudiness of real life. Harder to deal with but intrinsically more interesting to me. It is the loss of cultural awareness of that murkiness and importance that i find so discouraging, and motivating.

Translating unmappable facts into economic discourse, it turned out, was what Krugman was better at than anyone else: he could take an intriguing notion that had come up in real-world discussions, pare away the details (knowing just what to take out and what was essential), and refine what was left into a clean, clever, “cute” (as he liked to put it), and simple model. “It’s poetry,” Kenneth Rogoff, an economist at Harvard, says. “I mean, you go back to his first book and there was this beautiful chart about what the Volcker contraction did to output that swept aside so much—he just drew this little graph which really cleared the air. I’ve heard economists use the word ‘poet’ in describing him for decades.”

via How Paul Krugman found politics : The New Yorker.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading 349. Clarity at Reflections on GardenWorld Politics Douglass Carmichael.

meta

%d bloggers like this: