Conservative resistance to evolution is resistance to sanctioning change.

June 11, 2010 § Leave a comment

In a  seminar this morning on the pressure in business for rapid chance, and the resistance to this pressure (for example, how damaging it is to most small business), it got clear to me that one of the key reasons conservatives are opposed to "evolution" is that it implies acquiescence, or even embracing, change, especially social institutional change. And not just change, but particularly change that is not human nor god driven (or at least a reflection of a benevolent universe), but just a dumb and blind mechanical process.

Douglass Carmichael doug@dougcarmichael.com MAHB Millennium  Assessment of Human Behavior http://mahb.stanford.edu  Stanford Media X , Stanford Stratgey Studios and  Palo Alto StrategyStudios Book draft  at http://gardenworldpolitics.com  Palo Alto tues-thurs cell 206-388-7712 Russian River 707-865-0433

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading Conservative resistance to evolution is resistance to sanctioning change. at Reflections on GardenWorld Politics Douglass Carmichael.

meta

%d bloggers like this: