The X Factor of Economics – People – NYTimes.com

October 17, 2010 § Leave a comment

Which gets to another great variable: personal values. In his textbook “Principles of Economics,” N. Gregory Mankiw, a Harvard professor, proposed this thought experiment: A town must maintain a well. Peter, who earns $100,000, is taxed $10,000, or 10 percent of his income, while Paula, who earns $20,000, hands over $4,000, or 20 percent of her income.

“Is this policy fair?” Mr. Mankiw asks in “Principles.” “Does it matter whether Paula’s low income is due to a medical disability or to her decision to pursue an acting career? Does it matter whether Peter’s high income is due to a large inheritance or to his willingness to work long hours at a dreary job?”

Economics, Mr. Mankiw concludes, won’t tell us, definitively, whether Peter or Paula is paying too much, because an answer inevitably leads to matters of values, which inevitably leads to different answers.

This pointing to what we want, consideration of the human. But the examples have to be good. In this case, the implications of the contributions to the well need to be calculated out. For the town, for the participants, as a tax pol;icy, what Paula might have done differently with the 4k, etc. The problem with most economics is not the value s question, but the failure to run the model out to consequences, such as income distribution and its consequences.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading The X Factor of Economics – People – NYTimes.com at Reflections on GardenWorld Politics Douglass Carmichael.

meta

%d bloggers like this: